Muscle Cars Vintage vs New Essay Example

Muscle Cars: Vintage vs New Essay Ben Slenning Auto. 10. 28. 08 Period: 1 The vintage automobile was very simple, where as the modern automobile is very high technology and complex. In an automobile every part has a specific job and purpose. I am here to tell why the modern muscle car is a much better product than the vintage muscle car. I will show this in 7 ways: engine and horsepower, fuel system, ignition system, fuel economy, safety features, transmission and brakes. The 6 vehicles I will be comparing are a 1970 Dodge Challenger to a 2008 Dodge Challenger, a 1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302 to a 2009 Ford Mustang GT, and a 1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS to a 2009 Chevrolet Camaro. The modern muscle cars have better engines and more horsepower then the vintage muscle cars. The ’08 Challenger has a 6. 1L SRT Hemi putting out 425hp, while the ’70 Challenger only has a 5. 2L V-8 putting out 290hp. The ’70 Mustang Boss has a 5L V-8, which is putting out 290hp, while the ’09 Mustang GT has a 4. L V-8 putting out about 300hp. Last but not least, the ’09 Camaro has a 6. 2L V-8 putting out 422hp, where as the ’67 Camaro has a 5. 7L V-8 putting out 320hp. This showing the modern muscle cars have improved horsepower and that the modern muscle car is a better product than the vintage muscle car. The vintage muscle cars weren’t as fortunate to have to fuel systems that the modern muscle cars have today. The ’08 Chal lenger has a multi-port fuel injection system and the ’70 Challenger only has a 2-barrel carburetor. We will write a custom essay sample on Muscle Cars: Vintage vs New specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Muscle Cars: Vintage vs New specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Muscle Cars: Vintage vs New specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The ’70 Mustang boss has a 4-barrel carburetor, while the ’09 Mustang GT also has a multi-port fuel injection system. Lust like the ’08 Challenger and the ’09 Mustang GT, the ’09 Camaro also has a multi-port fuel injection system, where as the ’67 Camaro SS also has a 4-barrel carburetor. This showing better fuel systems and that the modern muscle car is a better product than the vintage muscle car. Third, the ignition system on the modern muscle cars is far different and better then the ones on the vintage muscle car. For example, all the vintage muscle cars have a distributor style ignition system. On the ’08 Challenger and the ’09 Mustang GT there is a coil on-plug ignition system. The ’09 Camaro has a high-energy distributor less ignition system. This showing better ignition systems and that the modern muscle car is a better product than the vintage muscle cars. The vintage muscle cars were averaging much lower fuel economy then the modern muscle cars. The ’70 Challenger, the ’70 Mustang Boss, and the ’67 Camaro all averaged a fuel economy of 10-12mpg. The ’08 Challenger averages 13-18mpg, the ’09 Mustang GT averages 17-26mpg, and the ’09 Camaro averages 16-23mpg. This showing better fuel economy and that the modern muscle car is a better product than the vintage muscle car. Another way that the modern muscle car is a better product then the vintage muscle car is in the safety features. All the vintage muscle cars had, was a seat belt that went across your lap to hold you in the seat. All the modern muscle cars have 3-point seat belts and front/side airbags, except for the ’09 Camaro, which has dual stage front/side airbags. This showing better safety and that the modern muscle car is a better product then the vintage muscle car. The vintage muscle cars didn’t have the high tech transmissions that are in the modern muscle cars today. Such as, the ’70 challenger offered you a 4-speed manual or a 3-speed automatic, where as now, the ’08 Challenger offers you a 5-speed automatic equipped with an auto stick. Also, the ’70 Mustang Boss offered a 4-speed manual, a 3-speed manual, or a 3-speed automatic, while now the ’09 Mustang GT offers a 5-speed automatic or a 6-speed manual. Last but not least, the ’67 Camaro only offered a 4-speed manual or a 2-speed automatic, and now the ’09 Camaro give you a nice, smooth ride with a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed automatic. This showing more improved transmissions and that the modern muscle car is a better product then the vintage muscle car. You would like a muscle car with top-of-the-line brakes, wouldn’t you? Well the modern muscle car is equipped with a much better brake system then the vintage muscle car. For example, the vintage muscle cars had front disc brakes and rear drum brake. Where now all the modern muscle cars have 4-wheel disc brakes and ABS. But the ’09 Mustang GT was also equipped with traction control. This showing safer brake systems and that the modern muscle car is much safer and a better product then the vintage muscle car. In conclusion, the modern muscle car out does the vintage muscle car by a long shot. Don’t forget the 7 ways, as you have just read, that the modern muscle car is a better product: engine and horsepower, fuel system, ignition system, fuel economy, safety features, transmission and last, the brakes. The modern muscle is a better product then the vintage muscle car.

Dayton, Mark essays

Dayton, Mark essays When Mark Dayton was sworn in as Minnesota's newest U.S. Senator in January 2001, it was the latest stop in a career that has kept public service to Minnesota and to the nation as its top priority. In more than three decades of service, in a variety of capacities, Mark has worked to use his skills and experience to make life better for the people of Minnesota and for people around the country. Mark was born in Minneapolis on January 26, 1947, and grew up in Minnesota's most prominent retailing family. Mark could have chosen many careers, but he chose to help those less fortunate than himself, and he has dedicated himself to that end throughout his career. After graduating cum laude from Yale University in 1969, where he played varsity ice hockey, he worked for two years in the New York City Public Schools as a 9th grade general science teacher. After spending the next four years as a counselor and administrator for a Boston social service agency, Mark went to work as a legislative as sistant to Minnesota Senator Walter Mondale, where he worked on a variety of issues important to his home state. In 1977, Mark returned to Minnesota to take a spot on Governor Rudy Perpich's staff. After one year, he was named the state's Commissioner of Economic Development. In 1982 he decided to make his own run for public office when challenged Republican U.S. Senator David Durenberger in a hard-fought race. Although he fell short, he gave the popular incumbent by far the toughest race of his Senate career. The following year, Mark became Minnesota's Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development, a post he held until 1986. In 1990, the people of Minnesota elected Mark to a four-year term as State Auditor. Throughout his career, he has also played an active role in helping Democratic candidates in Minnesota and across the country win public office and has been just as helpful to state, district and county Democratic organizations. In 1995 and 1996, Ma...